proj·ect - [n. proj-ekt, -ikt; v. pruh-jekt]
-noun
-verb (used with object)
-verb (used without object)
1350-1400; (n.) ME project ( e ) design, plan < ML projectum, L: projecting part, n. use of neut. of L projectus, ptp. of proicere to throw forward, extend, equiv. to pro- pro-1 + -icere, comb. form of jacere to throw; (v.) late ME project ( e ) (ptp.) extended, projected < L projectus.
c.1400, "a plan, draft, scheme," from L. projectum "something thrown forth," noun use of neuter of projectus, pp. of projicere "stretch out, throw forth," from pro- "forward" + combining form of jacere (pp. jactus ) "to throw" (see jet (v.) ). Meaning "scheme, proposal, mental plan" is from 1601. Meaning "group of low-rent apartment buildings" first recorded c.1958, from housing project (1932).
1. proposal. See plan. 6. contrive, scheme, plot, devise. 8. predict. 18. bulge, obtrude, overhang.
Just a quick note on notes. I want to be able to take notes efficiently on my Android phone which I can then sync to a computer, edit, and sync back. But wait, there is more:
* Ability to write and read notes on the mobile phone
* True Sync notes (with merge) to and from a computer
* Ability to create, edit, and search notes on the computer
* Must be able to do this without posting notes on some network service (but does not exclude a network service)
* Import/export notes from simple text files with some basic formatting (limited wiki like support)
Spending a couple of weeks looking through all the documentation and forums it was impossible to find a wiki module or wiki configuration that seemed to do everything needed for a pleasant site experience. Further it seems that most of the efforts took one of the primary open source project routes, like the large majority of open source projects:
So the proposal is to start with the basics, build up a list of requirements, then assemble in a single module with perhaps a couple (not more than 3) other primary modules. While documenting the whole process. The end result should be a Wiki setup for Drupal that can be used in all the sites supported by NOD.
Primary Goals:
Markdown: Syntax
================
* [Overview](#overview)
* [Philosophy](#philosophy)
* [Inline HTML](#html)
* [Automatic Escaping for Special Characters](#autoescape)
* [Block Elements](#block)
* [Paragraphs and Line Breaks](#p)
* [Headers](#header)
* [Blockquotes](#blockquote)
* [Lists](#list)
* [Code Blocks](#precode)
* [Horizontal Rules](#hr)
* [Span Elements](#span)
* [Links](#link)
* [Emphasis](#em)
* [Code](#code)
* [Images](#img)
* [Miscellaneous](#misc)
* [Backslash Escapes](#backslash)
* [Automatic Links](#autolink)
**Note:** This document is itself written using Markdown; you
can [see the source for it by adding '.text' to the URL][src].
[src]: /projects/markdown/syntax.text
* * *
Markdown is intended to be as easy-to-read and easy-to-write as is feasible.
Readability, however, is emphasized above all else. A Markdown-formatted
document should be publishable as-is, as plain text, without looking
like it's been marked up with tags or formatting instructions. While
Markdown's syntax has been influenced by several existing text-to-HTML
filters -- including [Setext] [1], [atx] [2], [Textile] [3], [reStructuredText] [4],
[Grutatext] [5], and [EtText] [6] -- the single biggest source of
inspiration for Markdown's syntax is the format of plain text email.
[1]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/mirror/setext.html
[2]: http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/atx/
[3]: http://textism.com/tools/textile/
[4]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
[5]: http://www.triptico.com/software/grutatxt.html
[6]: http://ettext.taint.org/doc/
To this end, Markdown's syntax is comprised entirely of punctuation
characters, which punctuation characters have been carefully chosen so
as to look like what they mean. E.g., asterisks around a word actually
look like \*emphasis\*. Markdown lists look like, well, lists. Even
blockquotes look like quoted passages of text, assuming you've ever
used email.
Markdown's syntax is intended for one purpose: to be used as a
format for *writing* for the web.
Markdown is not a replacement for HTML, or even close to it. Its
syntax is very small, corresponding only to a very small subset of
HTML tags. The idea is *not* to create a syntax that makes it easier
to insert HTML tags. In my opinion, HTML tags are already easy to
insert. The idea for Markdown is to make it easy to read, write, and
edit prose. HTML is a *publishing* format; Markdown is a *writing*
format. Thus, Markdown's formatting syntax only addresses issues that
can be conveyed in plain text.
For any markup that is not covered by Markdown's syntax, you simply
use HTML itself. There's no need to preface it or delimit it to
indicate that you're switching from Markdown to HTML; you just use
the tags.
The only restrictions are that block-level HTML elements -- e.g. ``,
`
`, ``, etc. -- must be separated from surrounding content by blank lines, and the start and end tags of the block should not be indented with tabs or spaces. Markdown is smart enough not to add extra (unwanted) `
` tags around HTML block-level tags. For example, to add an HTML table to a Markdown article: This is a regular paragraph.
| Foo |
` tags in the HTML output. For example, this input: * Bird * Magic will turn into:
Bird
Magic
It's worth noting that it's possible to trigger an ordered list by
accident, by writing something like this:
1986. What a great season.
In other words, a *number-period-space* sequence at the beginning of a
line. To avoid this, you can backslash-escape the period:
1986\. What a great season.
Code Blocks
Pre-formatted code blocks are used for writing about programming or
markup source code. Rather than forming normal paragraphs, the lines
of a code block are interpreted literally. Markdown wraps a code block
in both `` and `` tags.
To produce a code block in Markdown, simply indent every line of the
block by at least 4 spaces or 1 tab. For example, given this input:
This is a normal paragraph:
This is a code block.
Markdown will generate:
This is a normal paragraph:
This is a code block.
One level of indentation -- 4 spaces or 1 tab -- is removed from each
line of the code block. For example, this:
Here is an example of AppleScript:
tell application "Foo"
beep
end tell
will turn into:
Here is an example of AppleScript:
tell application "Foo"
beep
end tell
A code block continues until it reaches a line that is not indented
(or the end of the article).
Within a code block, ampersands (`&`) and angle brackets (`<` and `>`)
are automatically converted into HTML entities. This makes it very
easy to include example HTML source code using Markdown -- just paste
it and indent it, and Markdown will handle the hassle of encoding the
ampersands and angle brackets. For example, this:
© 2004 Foo Corporation
will turn into:
<div class="footer">
© 2004 Foo Corporation
</div>
Regular Markdown syntax is not processed within code blocks. E.g.,
asterisks are just literal asterisks within a code block. This means
it's also easy to use Markdown to write about Markdown's own syntax.
Horizontal Rules
You can produce a horizontal rule tag (`
`) by placing three or
more hyphens, asterisks, or underscores on a line by themselves. If you
wish, you may use spaces between the hyphens or asterisks. Each of the
following lines will produce a horizontal rule:
* * *
***
*****
- - -
---------------------------------------
* * *
Span Elements
Links
Markdown supports two style of links: *inline* and *reference*.
In both styles, the link text is delimited by [square brackets].
To create an inline link, use a set of regular parentheses immediately
after the link text's closing square bracket. Inside the parentheses,
put the URL where you want the link to point, along with an *optional*
title for the link, surrounded in quotes. For example:
This is [an example](http://example.com/ "Title") inline link.
[This link](http://example.net/) has no title attribute.
Will produce:
This is
an example inline link.
This link has no
title attribute.
If you're referring to a local resource on the same server, you can
use relative paths:
See my [About](/about/) page for details.
Reference-style links use a second set of square brackets, inside
which you place a label of your choosing to identify the link:
This is [an example][id] reference-style link.
You can optionally use a space to separate the sets of brackets:
This is [an example] [id] reference-style link.
Then, anywhere in the document, you define your link label like this,
on a line by itself:
[id]: http://example.com/ "Optional Title Here"
That is:
* Square brackets containing the link identifier (optionally
indented from the left margin using up to three spaces);
* followed by a colon;
* followed by one or more spaces (or tabs);
* followed by the URL for the link;
* optionally followed by a title attribute for the link, enclosed
in double or single quotes, or enclosed in parentheses.
The following three link definitions are equivalent:
[foo]: http://example.com/ "Optional Title Here"
[foo]: http://example.com/ 'Optional Title Here'
[foo]: http://example.com/ (Optional Title Here)
**Note:** There is a known bug in Markdown.pl 1.0.1 which prevents
single quotes from being used to delimit link titles.
The link URL may, optionally, be surrounded by angle brackets:
[id]: "Optional Title Here"
You can put the title attribute on the next line and use extra spaces
or tabs for padding, which tends to look better with longer URLs:
[id]: http://example.com/longish/path/to/resource/here
"Optional Title Here"
Link definitions are only used for creating links during Markdown
processing, and are stripped from your document in the HTML output.
Link definition names may consist of letters, numbers, spaces, and
punctuation -- but they are *not* case sensitive. E.g. these two
links:
[link text][a]
[link text][A]
are equivalent.
The *implicit link name* shortcut allows you to omit the name of the
link, in which case the link text itself is used as the name.
Just use an empty set of square brackets -- e.g., to link the word
"Google" to the google.com web site, you could simply write:
[Google][]
And then define the link:
[Google]: http://google.com/
Because link names may contain spaces, this shortcut even works for
multiple words in the link text:
Visit [Daring Fireball][] for more information.
And then define the link:
[Daring Fireball]: http://daringfireball.net/
Link definitions can be placed anywhere in your Markdown document. I
tend to put them immediately after each paragraph in which they're
used, but if you want, you can put them all at the end of your
document, sort of like footnotes.
Here's an example of reference links in action:
I get 10 times more traffic from [Google] [1] than from
[Yahoo] [2] or [MSN] [3].
[1]: http://google.com/ "Google"
[2]: http://search.yahoo.com/ "Yahoo Search"
[3]: http://search.msn.com/ "MSN Search"
Using the implicit link name shortcut, you could instead write:
I get 10 times more traffic from [Google][] than from
[Yahoo][] or [MSN][].
[google]: http://google.com/ "Google"
[yahoo]: http://search.yahoo.com/ "Yahoo Search"
[msn]: http://search.msn.com/ "MSN Search"
Both of the above examples will produce the following HTML output:
I get 10 times more traffic from Google than from
Yahoo
or MSN.
For comparison, here is the same paragraph written using
Markdown's inline link style:
I get 10 times more traffic from [Google](http://google.com/ "Google")
than from [Yahoo](http://search.yahoo.com/ "Yahoo Search") or
[MSN](http://search.msn.com/ "MSN Search").
The point of reference-style links is not that they're easier to
write. The point is that with reference-style links, your document
source is vastly more readable. Compare the above examples: using
reference-style links, the paragraph itself is only 81 characters
long; with inline-style links, it's 176 characters; and as raw HTML,
it's 234 characters. In the raw HTML, there's more markup than there
is text.
With Markdown's reference-style links, a source document much more
closely resembles the final output, as rendered in a browser. By
allowing you to move the markup-related metadata out of the paragraph,
you can add links without interrupting the narrative flow of your
prose.
Emphasis
Markdown treats asterisks (`*`) and underscores (`_`) as indicators of
emphasis. Text wrapped with one `*` or `_` will be wrapped with an
HTML `` tag; double `*`'s or `_`'s will be wrapped with an HTML
`` tag. E.g., this input:
*single asterisks*
_single underscores_
**double asterisks**
__double underscores__
will produce:
single asterisks
single underscores
double asterisks
double underscores
You can use whichever style you prefer; the lone restriction is that
the same character must be used to open and close an emphasis span.
Emphasis can be used in the middle of a word:
un*frigging*believable
But if you surround an `*` or `_` with spaces, it'll be treated as a
literal asterisk or underscore.
To produce a literal asterisk or underscore at a position where it
would otherwise be used as an emphasis delimiter, you can backslash
escape it:
\*this text is surrounded by literal asterisks\*
Code
To indicate a span of code, wrap it with backtick quotes (`` ` ``).
Unlike a pre-formatted code block, a code span indicates code within a
normal paragraph. For example:
Use the `printf()` function.
will produce:
Use the printf() function.
To include a literal backtick character within a code span, you can use
multiple backticks as the opening and closing delimiters:
``There is a literal backtick (`) here.``
which will produce this:
There is a literal backtick (`) here.
The backtick delimiters surrounding a code span may include spaces --
one after the opening, one before the closing. This allows you to place
literal backtick characters at the beginning or end of a code span:
A single backtick in a code span: `` ` ``
A backtick-delimited string in a code span: `` `foo` ``
will produce:
A single backtick in a code span: `
A backtick-delimited string in a code span: `foo`
With a code span, ampersands and angle brackets are encoded as HTML
entities automatically, which makes it easy to include example HTML
tags. Markdown will turn this:
Please don't use any `` tags.
into:
Please don't use any <blink> tags.
You can write this:
`—` is the decimal-encoded equivalent of `—`.
to produce:
— is the decimal-encoded
equivalent of —.
Images
Admittedly, it's fairly difficult to devise a "natural" syntax for
placing images into a plain text document format.
Markdown uses an image syntax that is intended to resemble the syntax
for links, allowing for two styles: *inline* and *reference*.
Inline image syntax looks like this:


That is:
* An exclamation mark: `!`;
* followed by a set of square brackets, containing the `alt`
attribute text for the image;
* followed by a set of parentheses, containing the URL or path to
the image, and an optional `title` attribute enclosed in double
or single quotes.
Reference-style image syntax looks like this:
![Alt text][id]
Where "id" is the name of a defined image reference. Image references
are defined using syntax identical to link references:
[id]: url/to/image "Optional title attribute"
As of this writing, Markdown has no syntax for specifying the
dimensions of an image; if this is important to you, you can simply
use regular HTML `` tags.
* * *
Miscellaneous
Automatic Links
Markdown supports a shortcut style for creating "automatic" links for URLs and email addresses: simply surround the URL or email address with angle brackets. What this means is that if you want to show the actual text of a URL or email address, and also have it be a clickable link, you can do this:
Markdown will turn this into:
Automatic links for email addresses work similarly, except that
Markdown will also perform a bit of randomized decimal and hex
entity-encoding to help obscure your address from address-harvesting
spambots. For example, Markdown will turn this:
into something like this:
address@exa
mple.com
which will render in a browser as a clickable link to "address@example.com".
(This sort of entity-encoding trick will indeed fool many, if not
most, address-harvesting bots, but it definitely won't fool all of
them. It's better than nothing, but an address published in this way
will probably eventually start receiving spam.)
Backslash Escapes
Markdown allows you to use backslash escapes to generate literal
characters which would otherwise have special meaning in Markdown's
formatting syntax. For example, if you wanted to surround a word
with literal asterisks (instead of an HTML `` tag), you can use
backslashes before the asterisks, like this:
\*literal asterisks\*
Markdown provides backslash escapes for the following characters:
\ backslash
` backtick
* asterisk
_ underscore
{} curly braces
[] square brackets
() parentheses
# hash mark
+ plus sign
- minus sign (hyphen)
. dot
! exclamation mark
It would seem that in order to get anything done, with respect to my software development projects, I can either use Sourceforge, or Google Source, or create a personal project management system myself.
I am not all that pleased with Sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/) I have tried to work them a few times in the past and it has always felt like dragging an anchor along with all the other project heavy lifting required. There isn't any one specific thing that makes Sourceforge difficult to use, it is more like an emergent result of many smaller issues that add together exponentially. My largest issue is that their whole interface style is so anti-ergonomic that it hurts. It's further telling that many of the more successful projects have their own site for documentation and forums only using Sourceforge for the distribution of releases and likely the source code version control services at the core.
Google Open Source Project Hosting (http://code.google.com/projecthosting/) is a lot cleaner than Sourceforge. I have not had an open source project kicked off yet that would let me experiment with using their services. I do have a number of projects which I intend to make open source so there are some opportunities in the future.
If course there is also GitHub (https://github.com/plans) which is very attractive. However, it isn't as comprehensive a tracking system as Google's project hosting. Still there is the commercial aspect problems in that I don't expect to be getting tons of money from any of this, so paying the monthly fees seems a bit of a waste.
In the mean time there is the issue of what to do with all my cruddy personal code, some of which I want to publish. For a majority of my code it would be in my best interest (for my reputation) to keep under lock and key. Yet, still I want a web based browsing systems, a continuous integration mechanism, and a source code version management system. Which means I need to set something up that can let me work. This project will be document the work done to achieve a shared project management system.
Create a project management site that will enable rapid professional development of software projects by providing transparently integrated services for source code management, automated continuous integration, automated publications, and trouble ticket tracking.
Transparent integration, for the purposes of this project, is defined as one or more services which are configured to tie-in with each other, as well as other external systems such that appropriate publication and client access of the related services appears to be dealing with a single service. The transitions between modules or systems is as seamless as possible with the goal of making the transitions undetectable.
Source code control is a common requirement in all software development projects. The basic requirements are well understood as:
- provide mechanisms for checking source code in and out of a central repository
- allows multiple developers to work on the same project
- mitigate the risk of lost code or overwritten changes
- provide version control management of files through the development life cycle keeping track of:
- which changes were made
- who made them
- when they were made
- why they were made
- enable version control of a group of files as a single release
- maintain multiple active releases concurrently (branching)
- enable joining different releases (merging).
A build service provides an automated feedback system (i.e. continuous integration) which ties into a Source Code Repository for one or more specific development projects. Specifically the build service is an automated system with the ability to compile/build, test, package, report, and track the quality of changes made to projects. A build service enhances the core abilities of build-tools such as make, Ant, Maven, or MSBuild, and then enabling continuous integration. The build service should:
- automatically compile projects into functional artifacts such as JARs, WARs, EARs, PDFs, xDocs, executable binaries, etc.
- automatically execute programmer tests such as xUnit based testing
- generate project documentation (compile Xdocs to PDFs, create html pages for web publication, etc.)
- generate distribution artifacts (zip, RPM, Windows MSI files, etc.)
- create reports and trends for detected errors, code quality, test reports, etc.
- deploy generated distribution artifacts into integration testing environments and perform automated integration testing (aka smoke testing).
- deploy successful distribution artifacts and documentation to one or more publicatio0n services
A primary key to improving the quality of a project is insuring sufficient, clear-to-read, up-to-date, and easy-to-access documentation. A project documentation system should:
- Apply the principles of modern production enabling project contributors to create information in small, reusable components that can be automatically assembled for different purposes;
- Be capable of automatically publishing to multiple types of media, including:
- Print (PDF),
- Web (HTML), and
- Other forms.
- Establish a documentation style that enables post processing for publications.
- Provide citation management.
- Automatically generate API documentation from source.
Trouble ticket (sometimes called a trouble report) is a mechanism used in an organization to track the detection, reporting, and resolution of some type of problem. The Internet Engineering Task Force's Network Working Group specified requirements for a trouble ticketing system in RFC 1297 (NOC Internal Integrated Trouble Ticket System Functional Specification Wishlist). In the RFC document, the author compares the trouble ticket to a patient's hospital chart, because both define a problem and help to coordinate the work of several different people who will work on the problem at different times. The core requirements are that a Trouble Ticket service should provide:
- Ticket lifecycle management
- Separation of work groups/units
- Authorization, i.e. definition of who can access which ticket groups
- Ticket update and re-assignment functionality
- Automated email correspondence to ticket groups enabling tracking of updates